Compare And Contrast The Various Ways In Which Socialists Aim To Acheive Social Equality.

Socialism and EqualityOctober , 2006Socialism and EqualityIntroductionSocialism was initially justified by criticizing capitalism in four areas : equality , majority rule , autonomy and community . firstly it is claimed that capitalism deprives levels of material equality in a humankind of affluence . In addition capitalism thwarts res publica by putting the vital decisions of the community in the hands of individuals . capitalism is also criticized in forcing more or less people into the status of pawns in other people s project thus . not more all over generate inequality and poverty through and through exploitation , it generates br alienation as well (Wright , 1995 . Finally it is claimed that capitalism underwrites a culture of selfish individualism and atomism (Wright , 1995Therefore , collectivism was advocated to revitalize the four negative areas in the capitalism societies . Socialism ideally offers ways of rectifying inequality , eliminating poverty , reducing alienation through a democratically controlled state that applies centrally planned miserliness . However , has socialism achieved equality within such a state ? This pull up stakes review literature in to dissolver this question . This pass on be studied under 3 sections : socialism and democracy , socialism and communism and conclusionsSocialism and DemocracyDemocratic movement which is elder than socialism can be fully illustrated by socialism and its principles . However , the notion of democracy has been differently interpreted in capitalist and socialist societies . Alex de Tocqueville , the author of `Democracy in the States , equated democracy with the `equality of condition and anticipated that after having done for(p) feudal and kings it will not be conquered in brush with middle classes and the rich (Miliband ,1994Indeed , socialism means equality and democracy in society politics and the economy , and insistence on peace among nation-states (Williams , 2001 ) That is why in socialistic states the power ideally should be in the hands of the majority , in some instances identified as the working class and it is also intrinsic that people enjoy certain(prenominal) level of autonomy .

This is achieved by democracy practiced transparently in politics , economic science , culture etcIn capitalism using some kind of democracy (liberal democracy the dominance of minorities is advocated by a condition that gives these minorities certain attri just nowes that make them more qualified for decision making and run the economy This assertion of the inevitability of nonage rule rests on one of two propositions . One of them is that there is a natural variableness in any society between a minority destined by virtue of its attributes to appropriate power , and the majority destined by reason of its lack of the required attributes to urinate the subordinate population . The required attributes may vary over time , and particular merit may be delegate to physical strength , or courage , or kind ability or specialized knowledge , or riches , or cunning , or a combination of them but however this may be , the unequal distribution of attributes will ensure the perpetuation of minority rule . The minority may be challenged but the result of the challenge , if successful , will always be the substitution of one ruling minority by another (Miliband 1994Nevertheless , have the socialistic states achieved democracy in ruling their...If you want to get a full essay, tramp it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .