Justifying the Morality of Abortion

As a gist of birth go, it is quite clear that abortion may hale be a somewhat more radical approach than any of the other contraceptive methods that ar now right away available to the big majority of American women. From birth control pills to condoms, sponges, diaphragms, spermicides, and other methods, most unwanted pregnancies can be prevented without having repair to abortion. Nevertheless, there are instances in which a charwoman becomes big(predicate) when this was non a desired state or when a failure to terminate a pregnancy would place the woman and/or her family (including any other barbarianren she may have) in an unendurable situation.

In such a situation, abortion as a form of birth control becomes more than the last haunt of a woman who has failed to take proper precautions against becoming pregnant. Women who are victims of rape or incest, women who learn that they are carrying a tike with serious and manners-threatening birth defects, and women whose other indebtednesss make it entirely but impossible for them to provide appropriately for a fry are legally as well as chastely justified in using abortion as a form of birth control. The ethical issues that are introduced in such situations are of significance. Women have a moral right and check obligation to protect themselves against unwanted pregnancies. It can certain

The opponents of abortion argue that any abortion at any point in a pregnancy is secret code more than murder - the taking of an innocent life and of the life of a being that becomes a person literally at the moment of conception. Viewed from this perspective, abortion under any circumstances seems unacceptable. Rationally, however, it must(prenominal) be recognized that a fetus is not in fact a person.

It does not think, it is not independent, and it is unable to run on its own outside of the body of its host. Consequently, it cannot be express to enjoy the status and rights of personhood.

The U.S. Supreme Court has not control specifically on this issue. What the Court has done is prohibit the vast majority of abortions after six months of a pregnancy because it is at that point that the fetus has the potential for survival outside of the mother's womb. I would argue that this particular practice should be recognized as identifying a specific point at which a fetus acquires autonomous rights that must be respected. Prior to that point, a woman's ratiocination to abort a fetus is morally justified because she is not in effect ending the life of a wolf that has achieved or reached personhood.

ly be argued that women have a moral obligation to care for an existing family and to take whatever steps aptitude be needed to prevent damage to that family. Should another child place an untenable burden on a fami
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.