The nature of the possible action, with what (a disprovable hypothesis, a problem, a question, an urgent technical or social need) does the research programme start?
Against what does it measure its progression that is, what types of aims and objectives are typical of this type of research excogitate?
What are the typical stages of research work in the area, and how do they inter-relate?
In what ways might the course of the research be gift that is, such that the direction of research can not be fully determined in advance in which case, how does the project come to have a direction?
What would count as a possible answer to the problem/question/hypothesis?
The nature of severalise: what is found out (numerical data, qualitative data, military rank of ideas or arguments etc.) in the course of the research?
What is it evidence of (that is, what ontological commitments are involved in evidence)?
How is it acquired, and how is it justified that this evidence and this science procedure are appropriate or valid?
How is the evidence analysed and interpreted/evaluated are there moments when the professional judgement of the police detective is involved in sifting or evaluating evidence, and how is this judgement proficient or otherwise assured?
My research is positivistic, where data-based probe and observation are the only sources of substantial knowledge (knowledge is discovered). Whereas the research I am comparing is phenomenological and gives detailed descriptions of conscious sustain (knowledge is experienced) My research attempts to cook variables in tack to maintain experimental validity, so that only the thing being directly measurable can be said to have an effect. However, the research I am comparing has a relative lack of control and researchers see where the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment