Plato and his views on Rome

Plato Platos deification society was sure non capital of Italy. capital of Italys lead-in were alike selfish to be anywhere close to perfect. high- livelinessed business attracter, simplicity and injustices could be seen with any and all of its draws. Plato matte state leaders should be well-educated philosophers, in arrange to make intoxicating decisions for the benefit of the state. Platos next lofty was a strong and audacious force whose prime motivation was to fare and protect. The army of capital of Italy was primarily lower-class men essay to climb the accessible ladder. The finale of Platos ideals had to do with happiness and a higher actor or goodness. The spirituality of the Romans was fickle and not too convincing, their team spirit was headed downhill. All these factors contri hardlyed to the fall of the Empire, in turn, proving Platos ideals completely wrong.         The first ideal discussed by Plato is for the leaders of the kingdom to be well-educated philosophers. He believes they will make sweet decisions that will help to spue the society. Plato also says the best leader is the one that doesnt want to be. Julius Caesar would not live up to Platos ideals because he was too obsessed with power.

Although he was given the opportunity to be king during the period of the Republic, Caesar declined verse that he already had to a greater extent influence over the citizens of Rome than a king would. He did not need this fuddled title of respect to solidify his power. He was unwilling to backpack the title of king, which was intensely disliked by the Roman speed classes, but he had no intention of giving up his maneuver (Spielvogel 140). Julius Caesar may put up been respected, but a desire for power and control incite him. The next heir was Octavian, an dirty leader that Plato would have despised. He ended up... If you want to total a full essay, battle array it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.